Facebook may start publishing its own "transparency reports"
WASHINGTON, USA: Amid a raging controversy over a sweeping US Internet surveillance programme,
top tech companies in a concerted move have asked the government ease
the secrecy surrounding national security investigations.
Google, Facebook and Microsoft in requests echoed by a top official
from Twitter also asked US officials Tuesday to lift long-standing gag
orders covering the nature and extent of information collected about
Internet users by the National Security Agency.
In an open letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and FBI
Director Robert S. Mueller III Google sought to be allowed to
significantly expand its semiannual "transparency reports" on the
information sought by courts and police worldwide.
"Google has nothing to hide," wrote Chief Legal Officer David Drummond.
Facebook soon after issued a statement suggesting that it may start
publishing its own "transparency reports" - a move the company has long
resisted.
"We urge the United States government to help make that possible by
allowing companies to include information about the size and scope of
national security requests we receive, and look forward to publishing a
report that includes that information," wrote Ted Ullyot, general
counsel to Facebook.
Microsoft issued a statement as well, saying that greater
transparency "would help the community understand and debate these
important issues."
The Washington Post and the Guardian last week had cited NSA
documents to suggest Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, Apple and other
technology companies were "providers" to PRISM, an NSA programme that
reportedly let intelligence analysts review a wide range of information
that users shared with the companies.
Meanwhile, the Senate Intelligence Committee, whose Democratic
chairperson, Dianne Feinstein has defended the surveillance efforts,
asked the NSA to publicly explain programmes that use telephone and
Internet records "so that we can talk about them, because I think
they're really helpful."
No comments:
Post a Comment