... complains a blogger, whose posts on Facebook, Twitter and other
online mediums are creating a flutter on E-commerce portals' delivery
model
BANGALORE, INDIA: There are several reasons why Indian consumers are
still apprehensive about ordering high-value goods online - read,
E-commerce portals.
Certainly, risk factors like physical damage, non-delivery, delayed
processing of request, replacement of goods and chances of being cheated
weigh heavily on their minds. And it is not worth spending so much on a
product, if the outcome is going to be one of the above.
Over the last couple of days, an informal consumer complaint has been
floating around on social media websites, including Facebook and
Twitter, apart from blogspots.
It talks about how the famous E-commerce portal, Flipkart, allegedly delivered junk in lieu of a Nikon D800 camera on therodinhoods.com - a forum for knowledge-sharing among entrepreneurs.
The blogpost
by one Alok Khemka narrates how he ordered a camera on the portal last
Thursday, but ended up receiving some junk in the camera box on
Saturday. "While i am still fighting with them over this issue, I would
like to put forth a discussion wherein I strongly feel that Flipkart's
own systems are not in order and they are making the customer a
scapegoat to hide this," (sic), it accuses.
"When i countered Flipkart customer care, they said that at times,
some other orders reach the wrong customer. I am terribly confused, when
did flipkart start selling junk products, is this a new product line,"
it goes on, "After 5 mins, the person finally understood that there is a
serious gap and asked for some time." (sic)
Upon supposedly reaching his wits' end after taking it up with
Flipkart customer care and the courier agency concerned without much
results, Khemka writes that he started posting the image of the junk in
the camera box and his experience on FB, Twitter, blogs and FB DPEG
page.
Apparently, the portal's social media team rang him up sometime after
he spread the word on Facebook and Twitter, requesting him to be
patient.
Khemka has posed two questions to the E-commerce portal, on whether
it is trying to cover up some gap in its own system by shifting the
blame to customers and as to why it is not keen on selling high-value
products, which supposedly were removed from the website.
No comments:
Post a Comment